3/29/2018 No, GMOs Didn’t Create India’s Farmer Suicide Problem, But… – Mother Jones

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2015/09/no-gmos-didnt-create-indias-farmer-suicide-problem/ 1/4

An Indian cotton field, ready for the harvest <a href=”http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-252822628/stock-

photo-cotton-field-white-with-ripe-cotton-ready-for-harvesting-maharashtra-india.html?

src=RpR8w27KCfpvsJOByCiR5A-1-7″>Tukaram Karve</a>/Shutterstock

No, GMOs Didn’t Create India’s Farmer

Suicide Problem, But…

T O M P H I L P O T T S E P. 3 0 , 2 0 1 5 1 0 : 0 0 A M

Looking for news you can trust?

Subscribe to our free newsletters.

EMAIL SIGN UP

3/29/2018 No, GMOs Didn’t Create India’s Farmer Suicide Problem, But… – Mother Jones

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2015/09/no-gmos-didnt-create-indias-farmer-suicide-problem/ 2/4

Since the mid-1990s, around 300,000 Indian farmers have killed themselves—a rate of about

one every 30 minutes, which is 47 percent higher than the national average. The tragedy has

become entangled in the rhetorical war around genetically modified seeds.

Some anti-GMO activists, including Indian scientist and organic-farming champion Vandana

Shiva, have blamed the high suicide rates directly on biotech seeds—specifically, cotton tweaked

by Monsanto to contain the Bt pesticide, now used on more than 90 percent of India’s cotton

acreage. Shiva has gone so far as to declare them “seeds of suicide,” because, she claims,

“suicides increased after Bt cotton was introduced.”

GMO enthusiasts, by contrast, counter that Monsanto’s patented seeds are a boon to India’s

cotton farmers: They’ve boosted crop yields, driven down pesticide use, and alleviated rural

poverty, a 2010 paper by the pro-industry International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-

biotech Applications (ISAAA) argued.

So which is it? According to a recent peer-

reviewed paper from a team led by Andrew

Gutierrez, a professor emeritus at the

University of California-Berkeley’s

department of environmental policy, science,

and management, the situation is way too

complicated to be aptly described by sound

bites in a rhetorical war.

For their analysis, the team looked closely at

yields, pesticide use, farmer incomes, and

suicide rates in India’s cotton regions, both

before and after the debut of Bt seeds in 2002.

They found that on large farms with access to irrigation water, genetically modified cotton

makes economic sense—paying up for the more expensive seeds helps control a voracious pest

called the pink bollworm in a cost-effective way.

India’s shift to industrial

farming left the majority of

the nation’s cotton farmers

increasingly reliant on

loans to purchase pricey

fertilizers, pesticides, and

eventually high-tech seeds.

3/29/2018 No, GMOs Didn’t Create India’s Farmer Suicide Problem, But… – Mother Jones

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2015/09/no-gmos-didnt-create-indias-farmer-suicide-problem/ 3/4

But 65 percent of India’s cotton crop comes from farmers who rely on rain, not irrigation

pumps. For them, the situation is the opposite—reliance on pesticides and the higher cost of the

seeds increase the risk of bankruptcy and thus suicide, the study finds. The smaller and more Bt-

reliant the farm in these rain-fed cotton areas, the authors found, the higher the suicide rate.

(An analysis that largely jibes with Shiva’s, apart from her heated rhetoric.)

Even so, the paper does not present Bt cotton as the trigger for India’s farmer-suicide crisis.

Rather, it provides crucial background for understanding how India’s shift to industrial farming

techniques starting in the 1960s left the majority of the nation’s cotton farmers increasingly

reliant on loans to purchase pricey fertilizers, pesticides, and hybrid seeds, and eventually GM

seeds, making them vulnerable to bankruptcy when the vagaries of rain and global cotton

markets turned against them.

The authors note that cotton has been cultivated in India for 5,000 years, and until the

emergence of the slavery-dependent cotton empire in the southern United States in the early

1800s, “India was the center of world cotton innovation.” In the 1970s, Indian cotton farmers

turned to hybrid seeds that delivered higher yields as long as they were doused with sufficient

fertilizer. Until then, the pink bollworm—the pest now targeted by Bt seeds—”was not a major

pest in Indian cotton,” they write. But higher-yielding plants draw more insect pests, and so the

new hybrid seeds also triggered an increasing reliance on insecticides. Bollworms evolved to

resist the chemical onslaught and many of their natural predators (other insects) saw their

populations decline, giving the bollworms a niche. Hence when Monsanto’s bollworm-targeting

Bt seeds hit the market in the early 2000s, they were essentially an industrial-ag solution to a

problem that had been caused by industrial agriculture.

As an alternative to Bt seeds, the paper shows, small-scale farmers can successfully plant

varieties of cotton that ripen quickly, before bollworm populations emerge. As for the irrigated

cotton farms that are now successfully using the Bt trait, the authors note that India’s large

farms, like many of California’s, are tapping underground water that’s “unregulated and

unpriced,” at rates much higher than natural recharge. They’re courting a problem that may

make the feared bollworm look tame by comparison: “the impending collapse of ground water

levels for irrigated cotton.”

FACT:

3/29/2018 No, GMOs Didn’t Create India’s Farmer Suicide Problem, But… – Mother Jones

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2015/09/no-gmos-didnt-create-indias-farmer-suicide-problem/ 4/4

Copyright ©2018 Mother Jones and the Foundation for National Progress. All Rights Reserved.

VIEW COMMENTS

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the

wealthy wouldn’t fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on

stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what

you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation so we can

keep on doing the type of journalism that 2018 demands.

DONATE NOW

T O M P H I L P O T T 

Tom Philpott is the food and ag correspondent for Mother Jones. He can be reached at

tphilpott@motherjones.com, or on Twitter at @tomphilpott.



Contact Us Terms of Service Privacy Policy