Research paper about Oman Airport

Write a research paper about Oman Airport
Write a research paper about Oman AirportAs part of your bachelor program you are expected to complete a “Project”. Select an appropriate project from the given below which you will be doing as part of your final year project for XYZ organization.Follow this format and guidelines:Task 2. Project Background and Objectivesii. Project titlei. Prepare a clear and well defined working title.ii. Abstract of the researchiii. Background of the studyiv. Research Objectivesv. Research questionsTask 3. Research Methodology and Scope of Studyvi. Proposed methodologyvii. Scope of the StudyTask 4. Bibliography and Timelineviii. Bibliographyix. Timeline (Gantt chart)- Don’t do the proposal which is task 1- Make sure to follow the additional requirements in the attached file.- No plagiarism

RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 1 of 12
Instructions to Student
General Instructions/information for the students for completing the assignment
 Answer all questions.
 Deadline of submission: 22/11/2020 23:59
 Word count 1800- 2000 Words
 The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage
of the assignment which is 50 marks
 Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is
submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.
 Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 06/12/2020
Module Learning Outcomes
1. Design and implement an effective project proposal relating to business and
information system.
2. Critically review existing academic literature relevant to an area of research.
3. Appraise the different research techniques and tools.
4. Evaluate, assess and choose research methods
Objective: This is an individual assignment aimed to give students the experience to design
and implement an effective project proposal relating to business and information systems. This
will help the students to achieve all learning outcomes while conducting own project proposal.
Assignment Tasks: Project Proposal
Instructions to students As part of your bachelor program you are expected to complete a “Project”. Select an appropriate project from the given below which you will be doing as part of your final year project for XYZ organization and submit a Project Proposal for the same. You are expected to work individually in preparing the project proposal.
`
IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT
Project Proposal
Module Code: BUSS 1008 Module Name: Research Methods and Project Design
Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 2 of 12
Task 1. Assignment Proposal (10 Mark) i. A brief work proposal discussing the following details must be uploaded on or before 1/11/2020 a) Selected Area of Research (1 Marks) b) One Paragraph write-up about selected topic (3 Marks) c) Understanding of Assignment Tasks (6 Marks)
Task 2. Project Background and Objectives (40 Mark) ii. Project title (5 Marks) i. Prepare a clear and well defined working title. ii. Abstract of the research iii. Background of the study (20 Marks) Give a detailed introduction to the project undertaken specifying the general aim of your project. Prepare your understanding of the field of study by critically analyzing the pertinent work of other investigators (5-7-literature review) leading up to your proposed work. iv. Research Objectives (10 Marks)
 Prepare objectives for the research proposal. v. Research questions (5 Marks)
 Prepare the research questions that sets out to answer the research problem specific to the project chosen
Task 3. Research Methodology and Scope of Study (30 Mark) vi. Proposed methodology (20 Marks)
 Prepare the research methods you intend to go about investigating the research questions. Also provide justification of your choice. vii. Scope of the Study (10 Marks)
 Prepare the scope of the research with its beneficiary and relevancy
Task 4. Bibliography and Timeline (20 Mark)
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 3 of 12 viii. Bibliography (10 Marks)
 Prepare the referred articles using CU Harvard referencing style. Citations should be added. ix. Timeline (Gantt chart) (10 Marks)
 Prepare the timeline using Gantt Chart with respect to the project undertaken. Timeline should provide only the requirements of this coursework.
Project Guide
Project title: The title of your research should explain in sufficient detail what you are doing. Therefore the project title should be well-defined and concise that describes the chosen project. The abstract is supposed to be a quick summary of your project and it is generally a paragraph or two in length. A title can also provide the reader an understanding of the basic point of your project.
Background study:
Introduction: This provides a description of the problem that will be addressed. The background information on the organization / client chosen for the project (if any) can be included. Details of specific department or functions, if required, can be provided. Also this includes the rationale for the project (why).
Project aim: Describes what the project is all about e.g., “are you trying to build an application /
website / framework etc.” Emphasize what is to be accomplished.
Literature Review: Describes the existing system / any problem or issues faced by the organization / client, which requires this project to be undertaken. This must start with a background of selected topic, the relevant literature identified and give reviews of background reading. Students are expected to review/evaluate the literature in comparison with their project tasks. The literature review must include a clear statement of approach to be taken to solve the problem with reference to the background reading. Keep in mind the following questions. What kinds of research have been done before? What relevant kinds of studies or techniques need to be mastered to do your project? Where is the state of the art today? How have others gone about trying to solve problems you want to tackle, and in what ways will your approach build on and vary from previous work?
Research questions: Well-thought-out and focused questions that identifies the phenomenon to be studied.
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 4 of 12
Research objectives: Steps you are going to take to answer your research questions or a specific list of tasks needed to accomplish the aim of the project
Proposed methodology: Select methodologies to answer the research questions. The reason for choosing the particular methodology must be justified properly. Need to mention regarding research design, sampling techniques, etc.
Bibliography: All citations in the literature review section should be mentioned in bibliography, but not all in the bibliography is important enough to be mentioned in the literature review. In other words, this section is a comment on the most valuable material you have identified which you will need to assimilate to do your project. Please refer to the Writing Manual by Center of Academic Writing.
Timeline: The realistic timeline (plan) of the project helps to minimize any interruption to the project activities. Timeline is a step by step guide to the stages of the research over the time period. Develop a Gantt chart to achieve this.
Rules & Regulations:
 All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style.
 The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
CU Harvard Style and page numbers.
 Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of
the faculty.
 Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
Guidelines:
Assignment must be computer typed.
 Font – Times New Roman
 Font – Style – Regular
 Font – Size – 12
 Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
 Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable
software or by pencil.
 Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment
collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings
from group work.
 You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material
from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be
in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 5 of 12
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation
of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of
violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the
student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of
plagiarism.
1. Plagiarism
A. First offence of plagiarism
I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in
any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of
deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed.
II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the
date he or she is advised to re-submit.
III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be
awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one
week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
B. Second offence of plagiarism
If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a
subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism
is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of
suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling
session in such cases.
2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 6 of 12
A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module
and shall be required to re-register the module
B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for
an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student
shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign
an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases.
3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation
If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as
recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic
Affairs.
4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level
academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs.
5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases”
mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an
institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The
committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take
appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation
which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
6. Types/Variations of Cases:
I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as
having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students
III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 7 of 12
All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the
policy will then be applied to all the students of the group.
IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment
component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual
reflection), the following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group
will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be
applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted
as per the policy.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual
assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that
student alone.
c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment.
* for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 8 of 12
 Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
 Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
 Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
 Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
 Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
Classification
And % Range <to be given
as per requirement>
Reflection and critical
analysis.
Knowledge and
Understanding/
Application of Theory
Evidence of Reading
Referencing and
Bibliography
Presentation, Grammar
and Spelling
Outstanding
>=71%
Highly competent
analytical skills and
reflective practice,
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values and
principles and professional
development planning.
Extensive knowledge and
depth of understanding of
principles and concepts
and /or outstanding
application of theory in
practice.
Evidence of reading an
extensive range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and procedures.
Accurate referencing and
bibliography correctly
using appropriate
referencing style
Excellent presentation,
logically structured, using
correct grammar and
spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to
supporting evidence
Excellent
67%-70%
Strong analytical skills and
reflective practice used,
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Excellent knowledge and
understanding of principles
and concepts and /or
excellent knowledge and
understanding of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a wide
range of educational
literature/research and
where applicable,
workplace strategies,
policies and procedures.
Appropriate referencing
and bibliography correctly
using appropriate
referencing style
Good presentation,
competently structured,
using correct grammar and
spelling, clear and easy to
use links to supporting
evidence
Very Good Quality
57% -66%
Good use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Good knowledge or key
principles and concepts
and/or good knowledge of
the application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a good
range of educational
literature/research and
where applicable workplace
strategies, policies and
procedures.
Generally well referenced
with correct use of the
appropriate referencing
style
Reasonable presentation,
completely structured,
acceptable grammar and
spelling, acceptable links to
supporting evidence
Good (Acceptable)
48% – 56%
Acceptable use of analytical
skills and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Acceptable knowledge of
key principles and concepts
and/or knowledge of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading an
appropriate range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable, relevant
workplace policies and
procedures
Adequate referencing.
Generally accurate use of
appropriate referencing
style
Adequate presentation and
structure, acceptable
grammar and spelling,
adequate links to
supporting evidence
Adequate/ Satisfactory
Adequate use of analytical
skills and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
Adequate knowledge of key
principles and concepts
and/or satisfactory
Evidence of minimal
reading of educational
literature/research and
where applicable relevant
Adequate referencing.
Appropriate referencing
style used but may contain
some inaccuracies.
Weak presentation ,
satisfactory structure,
grammar and spelling, links
to supporting evidence
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 9 of 12
41%-47% insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
evidence of the application
of theory in practice.
workplace policies and
procedures
Weak /Poor
(all learning outcomes not
adequately met)
<40
Little use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
competencies and/or
professional development
planning. Professional
values and principles not
reflected in the submission.
and/or
Insufficient/no use of
analytical skills and
reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
competencies and
professional development
planning
Little evidence of
knowledge of key
principles or concepts
and/or little evidence of
the application of theory in
practice
and/or
No evidence of knowledge
of key principles or
concepts and/or no
evidence of application of
theory in practice
Little or no evidence of
reading outside of the
course textbook and/or
reference to relevant work
place policies and
procedures
and/or
No evidence of reading
outside of the course
textbook and/or reference
to relevant workplace
policies and procedures
Little or no referencing,
incorrect style, or very
inaccurate use of
appropriate referencing
style
Poor presentation,
grammar and spelling, links
to supporting evidence
and/or
Unacceptable
presentation, grammar
and spelling, structure is
very poor, links to
supporting evidence
BUSS 1008– Research Methods and Project Design
ID NO. __________________ NAME : ______________________________________
Deliverables Aspects <4
Poor/Weak
4.1-4.7
Adequate /
Satisfactory
4.8 – 5.6
Good
5.9 – 6.6
Very Good
6.7 – 7
Excellent
7.1-10
Outstanding
Marks
Task1 Work
Proposal
Poor / No
relevant
discussion of
Work Proposal.
Poor or no
relevant
identification
of key
components of
work proposal
as specified in
the QP.
Incomplete
discussion on
specific key
components
observed.
Academic
writing found
weak.
Poor academic
writing.
Adequate /
Satisfactory
discussion
about key
components
of work
proposal.
Drastic
improvemen
ts needed in
the
discussion
and specific
discussion
on work
proposal
not
provided.
Academic
writing
needs
drastic
improvemen
ts.
Good
discussion
about work
proposal
However
improvement
s needed in
the discussion
of specific
key
components
of the work
proposals.
Academic
writing needs
improvement.
Very Good
discussion
of most of
the key
aspects of
work
proposal
Discussions
supported
by relevant
and specific
views.
However,
still
refinement
possible.
Scope of
improveme
nt exist in
academic
writing.
Excellent
discussion
of work
proposal.
Discussions
supported
by all most
all of the
key
component
s of the
work
proposals.
Outstanding
discussion of
work
proposal.
Discussions
supported by
all the key
components
of the work
proposals.
Relevant key
aspects and
critical
evaluations
highlighted.
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 10 of 12
Deliverables Aspects <16
Poor
16.1-18.8
Adequate /
Satisfactory
18.9-22.4
Good
22.5-26.4
Very Good
26.5-28
Excellent
28.1-40
Outstanding Marks
Task 2 Project
Backgroun
d and
Objective
Poor
discussion of
Background
and Objective
.
Poor or no
relevant
identification
of key
components of
Background
and Objective
.
Poor academic
writing on
dimensions of
quality
observed.
Adequate /
Satisfactory
discussion
about
Background
and
Objective .
Drastic
improvemen
ts needed in
the
identificatio
n and
discussion.
Specific key
point
discussion
on
Background
and
Objective
not
provided.
Academic
writing
needs
drastic
improvemen
ts.
Good
discussion
about
Background
and Objective
provided.
However
improvement
s needed in
the
identification
and
discussion of
specific key
components
of the
Background
and Objective
aspects.
Academic
writing needs
improvement.
Very Good
discussion
of most of
the key
aspects of
Backgroun
d and
Objective .
Discussions
supported
by relevant
and specific
views.
However,
still
refinement
possible.
Scope of
improveme
nt exist in
academic
writing.
Excellent
discussion
of
Backgroun
d and
Objective
component
s.
Discussions
supported
by all most
all of the
key
component
s of the
Backgroun
d and
Objective
of the
selected
topic.
However
critical
evaluation
can be
improved.
Outstanding
discussion of
Background
and Objective
aspects.
Discussions
supported by
all the key
components
of the
Background
and Objective
components.
Relevant key
aspects and
critical
evaluations
highlighted.
Deliverables Aspects <12
Poor
13.1-14.1
Adequate /
Satisfactory
14.2-16.8
Good
16.9-19.8
Very Good
19.9-21
Excellent
21.1-30
Outstanding Marks
Task 3 Research
Methodolo
gy and
Scope of
Study
Poor
discussion of
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic
provided.
Poor or no
relevant
identification
of key
components of
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic.
Adequate /
Satisfactory
discussion of
Research
Methodolog
y and Scope
of Study on
selected
topic
provided.
Drastic / Lot
of
improvemen
ts needed in
the
discussion of
Research
Methodolog
y, Scope of
Study on
Good
discussion on
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic
provided.
However
improvement
s needed in
the
identification
and
discussion of
specific key
components
of Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Very Good
discussion
and most
of the key
aspects of
Research
Methodolo
gy and
Scope of
Study on
selected
topic
provided.
Discussions
supported
by relevant
and specific
views on
key
Excellent
discussion
on
Research
Methodolo
gy and
Scope of
Study on
selected
topic
Discussions
supported
by all most
all of the
key
component
s of
Research
Methodolo
gy and
Outstanding
discussion
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic
Discussions
supported by
all the key
components
of the
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic
Relevant key
aspects and
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 11 of 12
Poor
discussion on
reflections of
Research
Methodology
and Scope of
Study on
selected topic
provided.
Academic
writing found
poor.
selected
topic.
Drastic
improvemen
t needed in
critical
evaluation
of most of
the key
components
of Research
Methodolog
y and Scope
of Study on
selected
topic.
Academic
writing
needs
drastic
improvemen
ts
Study on
selected
topic.
Academic
writing needs
improvement.
component
s.
However,
still
refinement
possible.
Scope of
improveme
nt exist in
critical
evaluation
discussions
and
academic
writing.
Scope of
Study on
selected
topic.
However
improved
reflections
of critical
analysis
can be
demonstrat
ed.
critical
evaluations
highlighted in
the
discussions.
Deliverables Aspects <8
Poor
8.1-9.4
Adequate /
Satisfactory
9.5-11.2
Good
11.3-13.2
Very Good
13.3-14
Excellent
14.1-20
Outstanding Marks
Task 4 Bibliograph
y and
Timeline
Poor or no
discussion of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Poor or no
relevant
identification
of key
components of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Poor
discussion on
reflections of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Academic
writing found
poor.
Adequate /
Satisfactory
discussion
Bibliography
and Timeline
Drastic / Lot
of
improvemen
ts needed in
the
discussion,
and critical
evaluation
of most of
the key
components
Bibliography
and Timeline
.
Academic
writing
needs
drastic
improvemen
ts
Good
discussion
about
Bibliography
and Timeline
However
improvement
s needed in
the
identification
and
discussion of
specific key
components
of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Academic
writing needs
improvement.
Very Good
discussion
and
illustrations
of most of
the key
aspects of
Bibliograph
y and
Timeline
Discussions
supported
by relevant
and specific
views on
key
component
s of
Bibliograph
y and
Timeline
However,
still
refinement
possible.
Scope of
improveme
nt exist in
academic
writing.
Excellent
discussion
Bibliograph
y and
Timeline
Discussions
supported
by all most
all of the
key
component
s of
Bibliograph
y and
Timeline
However
improved
reflections
of critical
analysis
can be
demonstrat
ed.
Outstanding
discussion of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Discussions /
illustration
supported by
all the key
components
of the of
Bibliography
and Timeline
Relevant key
aspects and
critical
evaluations
highlighted in
the
Bibliography
and Timeline
RMDP (BUSS 1008) – Fall – 2020 – CW 1(Assignment) – All Sessions – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 12 of 12
Signature of the Evaluator :
Total Marks
Comments :
Penalty
Final Marks

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Research paper about Oman Airport
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Get professional assignment help cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.

Why choose our academic writing service?

  • Plagiarism free papers
  • Timely delivery
  • Any deadline
  • Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
  • Subject-relevant academic writer
  • Adherence to paper instructions
  • Ability to tackle bulk assignments
  • Reasonable prices
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Get superb grades consistently

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via +1 817 953 0426

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code VICTORY